监护人媒体技术公司起诉贝尔、海尔、海信、康佳、创维、厦华、宏基等公司侵犯专利权,我国应诉策略分析
案件日期与名称 |
一审法院 |
法官姓名 |
诉讼类型 |
起诉理由 |
案件1;April 20, 2009 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Apex Digital, Inc. et al |
CA Central |
Real |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Defendant: Apex Digital, Inc., AT&T, Inc., BenQ America Corporation, Digital Products International, Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation and others... |
||||
|
||||
案件2:January 6, 2009 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C. |
CA Central |
Snyder |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Defendant: Toshiba |
||||
|
||||
案件3:October 10, 2008 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Philips Electronic North America Corporation et al |
CA Southern |
Anello |
Patent |
Federal Question |
Defendant: Philips Electronic North America Corporation, Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America, INC |
||||
|
||||
案件4:June 16, 2008 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp. |
CA Central |
Klausner |
Other Contract |
Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. Defendant: Syntax-Brillian Corp. |
||||
|
||||
案件5:May 8, 2008 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd v. Vizio, Inc. |
CA Central |
Wright |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies Ltd, Guardian Media Technologies Ltd, Guardian Media Technologies Ltd, Guardian Media Technologies Ltd Defendant: Vizio, Inc. |
||||
|
||||
案件7: |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Philips Electronic North America Corporation |
CA Central |
|
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Defendant: Philips Electronic North America Corporation |
||||
|
||||
案件8: |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC et al |
CA Central |
Snyder |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Defendant: Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba America, Inc. |
||||
|
||||
案件9:February 19, 2008 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd v. Hitachi Ltd et al |
CA Central |
Real |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies Ltd, Guardian Media Technologies Ltd, Guardian Media Technologies Ltd, Guardian Media Technologies Ltd Defendant: Hitachi Ltd, Fujitsu Hitachi Plasma Display Ltd., Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. |
||||
|
||||
案件10:December 18, 2007 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies v. Daewoo Electr, onics Corp et al |
CA Central |
Real |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies, Guardian Media Technologies, Guardian Media Technologies, Guardian Media Technologies Defendant: Daewoo Electronics Corp, Daewoo Electronics America Inc |
||||
|
||||
案件11:August 14, 2007 |
||||
Thomson Inc. v. Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. |
CA Southern |
Hayes |
Patent |
Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
Plaintiff: Thomson Inc.; Defendant: Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. |
||||
|
||||
案件12:January 29, 2007 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd v. LG Electronics Inc et al |
CA Central |
Real |
Patent |
Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies Ltd; Defendant: LG Electronics Inc, LG Electronics USA Inc |
||||
|
||||
案件13:August 8, 2006 |
||||
Guardian Media Technologies Ltd v. Mustek Systems Inc |
CA Central |
|
Patent |
|
|
||||
案件14:May 10, 2006 |
||||
GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD vs. MUSTEK SYSTEMS, INC. |
WI Western |
|
Patent |
|
|
||||
案件15:April 4, 2006 |
||||
GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD vs. AUDIOVOX CORPORATION |
WI Western |
|
Patent |
|
|
||||
案件16:March 31, 2006 |
||||
GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD vs. KENWOOD CORPORATION |
WI Western |
|
Patent |
|
- 网红主播利用流量模仿大牌伪造名牌销售构成商标侵权
- 知识产权犯罪|全国首例人工智能领域侵犯商业秘密案刑事案件
- 电商平台一件代发等销售“剪标”“刮码”商品是否商标及不正当竞争侵权
- 明知不如何著作权内容恶意提起诉讼滥用诉权反被赔偿10000元
- 未经短视频创作者盗用搬运未授权版权其短视频进行直播带货构成著作权侵权
- 协助企业参与国内数据要素建设事拿到多省市十二个数据知识产权证书实现零突破
- 企业网盘撤诉是否构成网络虚拟财产侵权为两家电商公司争取避免300万赔偿金额
- 抖音小店直播带货抖店保证金押金被冻结违反规则商标侵权
- 平台企业作为中间商为游戏用户提供商业化代练游戏服务构成不正当竞争
- 企业遇到专利权侵权案件的抗辩思路与应诉方式
- |影视公司批量维权快捷酒店电视设备设置点映影片不构成知识产权著作权侵权
- 某服装在短视频直播带货构成商标侵权被判惩罚性赔偿300万
- 电商网店“一件代发”不进货代销商构成知识产权侵权法律风险与相关问题
- 知识产权侵权案件被告应该如何利用合法来源抗辩成立不承担赔偿责任
- 将从正品渠道购买的商品低价售卖不构成知识产权侵权终不正当竞争